Skip to content

Compare models

Put up to 4 models beside each other — token prices, context windows, capabilities and provider, from the same catalogue the model pages read.

  1. Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogleRemove
  2. GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAIRemove
gemini-3.7-flash vs gpt-6.1-terra
AttributeGemini 3.7 Flashgemini-3.7-flashGPT-6.1 Terragpt-6.1-terra
Pricing
Input$0.375 / 1M$1.00 / 1M
Output$1.88 / 1M$5.00 / 1M
Cache Write (5m)$0.375 / 1M$1.00 / 1M
Cache Write (1h)$0.375 / 1M$1.00 / 1M
Cache Read$0.375 / 1M$1.00 / 1M
Web Search$0 / 1M$0 / 1M
Context
Max context1M1M
Max outputN/AN/A
Capabilities
VisionYesYes
Function CallingYesYes
JSON ModeYesYes
StreamingYesNo
Catalogue
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Categorychatchat
Charge typePay As You GoPay As You Go
Released——
Description
SummaryGemini 3.7 Flash is Google's fast multimodal model designed for agentic workflows, coding, and complex multi-step reasoning. It combines responsive inference with reliable problem-solving capabilities, making it well suited for interactive and production-scale applications. Optimized for speed and dependable multi-step execution, Gemini 3.7 Flash is a strong choice for coding assistants, autonomous agents, and high-throughput workflows that require both low latency and capable reasoning.GPT-6.1 Terra is OpenAI’s mid-tier model in the GPT-6.1 series, designed to balance capability, speed, and cost efficiency. Positioned below GPT-6.1 Sol, it delivers strong performance across everyday agentic workflows, coding, and professional writing, with particular strengths in screenshot understanding and on-screen content analysis. Optimized for high-volume production workloads, GPT-6.1 Terra is well suited for coding assistants, visual interface analysis, workflow automation, and scalable agentic applications that require reliable performance at an accessible cost.